The science of information systems has generated considerable debate on the possibility of macro evolution. Not only do living cellular structures lend themselves well to this kind of analysis but the complexity of living systems is vastly greater than the cyber systems normally studied under this type of science. According to scientist Michael Denton genomes or basic genetic material carry at least 1000 million bits of complex information or enough to fill 1000 volumes in a typical library.They include complex encoded algorithms for the growth, development, and possibly even the death of billions of cells. These storage and retrieval programs with their replication mechanisms and self diagnosis of defects and chemical repair systems are far beyond any computer programs achieved through the intelligence of man. To think they arose through natural selection and random chance should be incredulous.Such systems would no more arise by chance and natural selection than brand new Boeing 777's would arise in junk yards from the effects of tornadoes.

Complex systems whether mechanical or biological require energy, matter AND intelligent programming of information content. Such understanding is plainly obvious when one has experience in software programming as well as engineering and mechanical design. Fully functioning complex machines and systems require precise programming of information. Turning on and off computers or entering random data into a computer does not create operational programming functions. In the same way the vastly more complex and sophisticated programming of DNA and its double helix complex structure does not lend itself to the lack of intelligent design. The mathematical possibility of such a complex structure arising in a primordial "soup" through random chance was calculated by Sir Fred Hoyle to be one in 10 to the 30,000 power or in simple terms- statistically impossible.

The truth is that thousands of scientists are coming to this realization all over the world and many have joined creation based research organizations. Unfortunately the evolution establishment seems to be operating it's own "Inquisition of belief" if you will of those brave enough to question evolutionary theory. The brilliant Sir Fred Hoyle after publishing the mathematical impossibilities of macro-evolution was not only denounced by evolutionist critcs but he lost his nomination for the Nobel prize. Robert Gentry published works on polonium rock halo dating and because his work showed a possible younger earth than currently accepted by evolutionists he lost his research grants and his job. Dr. A.E. Wilder-Smith gave the Huxley Memorial lecture at Oxford University in England in Feb. 1986 and because of his effective rebuke of evolutionary theory through biology and information systems the college purged any record of his lecture. No records exist today it ever occurred. So much is the intolerance and censorship of the evolutionary camp that scientists and teachers in general are reluctant to criticize the theory no matter how bankrupt it is becoming .However, the truth of origins has far reaching consequences both temporally and in eternity and in the end the truth will win out.

 

To those interested in a more in depth study of this subject read AE Wilder-Smith's books: "The Scientific Alternative to Neo-Darwinian Evolutionary Theory","The Creation of Life" and "The Natural Sciences Know Nothing of Evolution"published by TWFT (Calvary Chapel Church) in Costa Mesa, Ca.